Should parents continue to finance their children after the children are 18?

[cupidkisses]

Yes

No

[Amonimous]

College is basically an essential part of primary education at this point. If one is to reliably get a decent job, education beyond high school is important, and it isn't practical for 18-year-olds to work full time, go to school full time, and take out loans to pay for the expenses they can't yet afford.
Sure, there are cheaper options for education after high school, but these typically provide less benefit to the student.
Also, because a college degree is expected for most jobs in well-paying fields these days, people typically do not start contributing to society in a meaningful way until they are in their mid-20s.
In the USA, 18 years makes a person an adult in a legal sense, but society (self-fulfillingly) doesn't regard them as one.
Because of this, I think that parents should regard having a child as a 20-25 year commitment, instead of the historic sentiment of 18 years.

[Shakazo]

No rules. It depends if they can. If they will. If you are make long studies. If you have a half part time job.

[AussieGirl1989]

Did you make it? yes I did that's your responsibility then til they die you die

"As babies grow up into adults"

Do you need blocks to go along with your education?

as this is basic education as I told my father when I walked out the door and I then shut it upon him and never bothered to think I have a father at all afterward how do I support myself without my faith era gestures of parental guidance at times having kids pays it should and it does otherwise I'll file a lawsuit all of its mine then don't birth me unless you're to raise me

And as I was saying need blocks and baby talk to define how to be a decent parent?

😊👍

[Catholicgirl22]

If they choose to and if they are able to. Most parents are unable to and honestly a parent shouldn't have to support another adult when they are practically retirement age. If anything a plus 18 year old should be contributing to the family espicially if they live at home and when a parent gets older their children should look after them.

[2plus2is4]

Yeah, they should. It's their responsibility
As a parent, you don't just ''Hey you're eighteen now! It's about time I stopped supporting you!''
A parent should be there regardless to support their children to help them get by in life. There are parents who raise children completely wrong and drops the bomb on 'em, then we wonder why there's so many people on the streets. This is one of those cases.
A parent should have intentions since before birth as a plan of focusing on full dedication of proper connectivity, so yes, they should keep financing their children after they are eighteen and that should be a custom. A parent should be steps to independence no matter what age, and in return for when a parent is on a down low or whatever circumstance, the child they raised completely to be able to stand on their own two feet through the parent's support, will repay the parent with certainty whenever in need, as the parent will be the first thought that comes to mind as ''who was there for me from the very beginning.''
''Do onto others as as you would have them do unto you.''
Parents are no exception

[StrangerByTheDay]

For me it is a NO, but it certainly depends on the situation.
I think by cutting the finance they should make them more responsible, thus getting to understand how things work in the real world.
Since we were born till the day we started working we were mostly depending on our parents, regardless their financial situation.
So by the age of 18, they should start working and making their own money which gives them the sense of responsibility.
I used to work part time jobs since I was 16. I bought my first cell phone, it was a huge one with antenna and they were expensive.
the summer after I worked and bought my Electric guitar.
When I started working it was my turn to pay the bills etc... as my mother being a single parent, I had to help her after her helping me for 20 years.

[robske]

Depends, I live at home (my parents own the building I live above, it’s a apartment all to myself but they own the bar underneath it, so technically I still live with them)

They don’t have to pay things for me, my expenses, my car, my alcoholic tendencies
All out of my pocket, but my parents want to help me get a good start at life

There is no law that says they have to do this, but isn’t that what any parent would want?

I’d say, a parent is financially responsible to the age of 18 (not mentioning emancipated minors)
After that it’s out the goodness of the parents heart wether or not the contribute

[jhurl22]

I am currently funded my way through university. I bought my driving lessons, paid for my test, my insurance and my first car. I have travelled Europe with friends last summer and I am traveling Thailand/Cambodia/Vietnam this summer. And I am only 20 years old! I work very hard and earn my money for myself. Simple as that. I work for it all. My parents have money, but they guided me in the direction that I am in so that I don’t turn into a spoilt brat who doesn’t know the value money.
On top of all that, I fund my social life, taxis/eating out/parties/drinks etc. if you grow up getting everything handed to you on a plate then you’ll never be able to have any independence like me. I think it is RIDICULOUS when parents find everything when you’re 18 plus. GET A JOB!

[hornymike6969]

exactly. well said. to many lazy fking kids out there

[madhatters4]

i think you are doing a disservice to the child unless perhaps you are paying for school or something like that. but if you are simply paying for a lifestyle of a child after 18 who isn't actively pursuing something which they are not equipped to pay for then you are definitely doing a disservice to that child

[angelin]

It’s a parents responsibility to help the child cultivate good habits to become self reliant before 18 and sometimes this isn’t the case in sheltered or “bad” homes. Get the pup ready to leave the nest before it becomes to exhausting when they are at age. If the job is done and the 18 year old is not going when ready, a slight push could be given to help reinforce self sustainability.

[jennifer_bloom]

I think it depends - if the person wants an education and the parents can afford to pay the tuition and still have some left over for themselves or if the kid isn't smart enough to work part time while taking a course load full time then its a good idea. But care after the age of 18 should be given on a volunteer basis.

[witherwing]

Depends on how capable the children are of taking care of themselves. Parents always have a certain responsibility for their children, even after they turn 18, but if their kids are well capable of taking care of themselves, but just choose not to, I don't think parents should reinforce that behavior.

[rogkira]

It depends on what you mean by Finance above 18. Personally I think of child should live with their parent until they're able to fully support themselves.

I'm 28 years old and my parents let me move back with them until I was able to save $20,000 for down payment for a condo.

But if you mean continue to give them allowance then no, they should be able to work and pay for their own things even while living at home.

[goaded]

Saving you rent and financing you are two different things.

[rogkira]

Yes i know and i thought i was clear. After your out of school you should not be living off your parents even if you live with them, get a job and benefit yourself.

And please tell what it means. Since I'm clearly not getting it.

[Malita55]

Yes. As long as they are working towards trying to be able to support themselves, parents should support their kid until they are ready to be independent. Especially when it comes to college. That shits expensive

[Feyben]

Depends on what the children do. I'm glad that my parents finance me for my technical college. I couldn't afford this my own, because i can't work much additionally.

But if children work, after they are 18, they should learn how to handle money.

But parents should not push their children to move out, as soon as they are 18. Because they need to develop themselves and save money first. And that may take a few more years. It's possible to move out at 18, but it's not the parents choice.

[p1235]

Well, I don't really see it as a duty, especially if the children were raised to expect that they'd be on their own at the age of 18.

However, support is always welcome

[My-Shangri-La]

This isn’t a yes or no question. It’s totally circumstantial. If the kid is being a bum and not trying to advance himself, then no. If he’s trying to find a career or going to school and needs a little help, then yes

[Kai02]

They shouldn't keep financing them but if they're in a really rough spot they should help them, but same vice versa as well if the parents are having issues money wise

[Markasaurous]

Depends, if it is college tuition then sure, if not then probably no.

[Natalie11299]

Yes, if they can afford it and until the son/daughter is finished with college.

[hornymike6969]

get a job while in school like most kids do

[Anonymous]

In this day and age, it’s a must!!

Had my parents not done so (to supplement my full-time income), I’d have never been able to go to university and progress academically.

[-Beonkia]

If the child is still living at their parents homes, then yes. Not everyone gets out at age 17 or 18

[Queen_gamer]

If they are in school and doing something with their life then yes. If they aren’t going to school, don’t have a job or just not doing anything get your shit and go

[Jesslin412]

My mom and I pay bills together. We can’t really afford to live separate