Girls below 5'5" aren't girls, they're Pokémon. Do you agree?

Courtesy @Schrodingerscat and @YourFutureEx
Girls below 5'5




Fun Read :
1. Why Men Prefer Short Girls
2. Why Being A Tall Girl Is Better Than Being Short
No, they're worth catching 😍
Whoever said it, is just *insert insult* 😏
Yes, I agree 🤐
We cannot have fun on GAG. Ask sensible questions... 😑
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Girls below 5'5" aren't girls, they're Pokémon. Do you agree?
Post Opinion