Why is it socially unacceptable for a woman to be with a man for his money but not for a man to be with a woman for her looks/body? (Page 2)

Question

Date, sleep with, marry... Why do you think this is okay in our society? Or do you even agree that this is a socially acceptable norm of our society? Here’s the Tweet I found today that inspired the question.

Darklydarkened · Answer

That would make some portion of women "not that lovely" Remember that we live in a time that all women are so very precious.

Rangers · Answer

Girls at first don't offer anything but looks because they don't do the approaching, and we aren't deceitful with it, whereas girls are with taking their money.

-Asca- · Answer

1. It isn't
2. It's not okay for a man to be with a woman for money either
3. Looks are parts of the person, money is not. You should be with a person for the person, not because of something that has absolutely nothing to do with the person itself.

TripleAce · Answer

Right lol i bet ill make no sense to you 😆 Its because money isn’t natural and attraction is a natural process

undoubledsolid7 · Answer

In my personal opinion I say be with whom or whatever makes you happy. However on that note please don't just use people for your own personal gain, be true to them and it will much more rewarding

Liam_Hayden · Answer

It is an apples to oranges comparison. Looks, personality, attitude are integral parts of the woman. Money is NOT an integral part of the man. It is that simple.

Max_SS · Answer

It's mostly women trying to shame men because they're not with them instead

katjana21 · Answer

Its both wrong. You are shallow if you marry or are with someone just for money/looks/sex.

LMNOP123 · Answer

I thought the opposite was true. In fact I strongly feel the opposite is true.

FýrdracaDócincel · Answer

Easy.. because looks actually have something to do with the individual. Next trying-too-hard-to-be-deep question!

Landshrk0068 · Answer

There's nothing wrong with either. Both are great examples of male and female nature. It's just the way it is.

backdoorman · Answer

I don't think one is any more socially acceptable than the other. The biggest difference in my opinion is that men tend to be more honest about it.

name_is_eric · Answer

Because money shouldn't be an attraction, looks should. Going after looks is natural, going after someone's wealth is just cheap. Such a dumb comparison.

Scottstape · Answer

Looks n body is how humans have evolved to improve our species for millions of years. Money is a logical choice usually associated with lust or passion.

anametouse · Answer

Bruh what's shallow is shallow come on neither is justified. The relationship you're describing are relationships that don't last. Did we forget about personality?

bellamossa · Answer

It's not acceptable. When ablit of his momey, it's bitchy from her and stupid from him. Coz money alone and beauty alone don't give any long term happiness.

ronaldo75 · Answer

This is a strawman and you're posting this to get the answers about 'double standards' you're looking for. It's 2019 hun... this type of posting is old and tired.

MrMilti · Answer

In which way are golddiggers socially accepted? Everyone hates them.

AngelLily · Answer

Most people consider it wrong for a man to only be with a woman for her looks.

jcclifton · Answer

It sounds more like a mutual agreement. I'm not sure I follow

Ronald_ · Answer

Who said it is unacceptable? This should be one of the most normal things in the world!

BrookieCookie0422 · Answer

I’ve never heard of either of these things being more or less acceptable.

JimboGB · Answer

At least an man after you because of your looks is appreciating part of who you are. The women in this situation is after what's in your pocket.

Daniel3035 · Answer

If you really knew a guy we never "to be with" a woman with her body we fuck a woman for her body in a one night stand.

Bri070 · Answer

Both are socially acceptable. Both are objectification and that's ok in the current society. I don't like it, but I do see reality.

magneto912 · Answer

It is not. People do it all the time...  If it was really unacceptable socially people would not do it at that level.

AcidT0y · Answer

Your looks / body is part of what you are. Your money is part of what you have. It's apples to oranges. That's my interpretation of it anyway.

Shellyworld · Answer

Because looks stay with you and money doesn’t. And it is even gross for a man to marry a women with money.

MannMitAntworten · Answer

I could care less either way. Go ahead and use each other. Just ne honest about it.

BrownBratzDoll · Answer

Because this a man world and society is set up with the viewpoint and values of whats ok to men

CasaNorba · Answer

because this means that you're obviously a prostitute

winterfox10 · Answer

Because beauty is unique to the woman, but money isn't unique to the man.

SUMAIREBRAHIM · Answer

All is bullshit It's okay As long as the couple don't have problem with it or each other  No should give a Damm about society

Nades · Answer

If you’re a guy and you only look for body, you’re a degenerate. If you’re a girl and you only look for money, you’re a degenerate. End of story

RationalMale · Answer

Because looks are like a sense of humor or wit or sweetness or such. It's a part of that person.

Aphrodite801 · Answer

This is a stupid question that doesn’t add up with the quote in the pic. Seriously.

StickStickity13 · Answer

Women are ridiculous for even asking that question (the one in the photo)

lernulo · Answer

I would like to know who consider right that the man stay with a woman for her looks.

Browser101 · Answer

It is socially acceptable but people are extra jealous and talk trash about it.

selfdestruction · Answer

Looks are fleeting. I’d rather marry a woman that cooks for me and sucks a mean dick. If she happens to rock her looks, more the bonus.

ThereIsWhat · Answer

No idea what the answer is but a very good question.

DashboardLight · Answer

Because part of loving relationship is a physical attraction towards the person.

Pulimuli · Answer

Because physical attraction is natural and biological  Money is made up by society

Mamamialetmego · Answer

Looks at least about the person but money has nothing to do with person, it's a thing.

Spitfire808 · Answer

I didn't know it was fine to marry for looks until now. This makes everything so much simpler. Time to go ask out the hottest chicks in town

Smegskull · Answer

It isn't wrong for women to marry for money. What is wrong is not being honest about it.

Armourdillo · Answer

It's not... I live in new york, women are supported in going for men with money.

ShadowedSoul · Answer

This question itself is not a wise one as both the statements are incorrect

Anonymous · Answer

Women actually care rather about looks than money. I always see how handsome guys or good looking celebrities are are worshipped by women.

luciusmalfoy1 · Answer

Women marry and date just for looks too, perhaps more than men - THAT’S why...

morimeme1 · Answer

I feel like it's the other way around but ok

mistixs · Answer

Agreed 10000%

teamvic · Answer

I can't spend a girls looks

Dav1ss · Answer

Because its a double standard

Dsg1193 · Answer

I thought they were both wrong

Jennifer_32 · Answer

I am NOT my money You ARE your looks+body

lucasnabizada · Answer

It is acceptable and happens all the time period.

etf0nehome · Answer

Either way is pretty shallow in my opinion

Arielbubble · Answer

Sexist society honey.

PrettyRegular · Answer

Isn't it acceptable for women to marry for looks?

Why is it socially unacceptable for a woman to be with a man for his money but not for a man to be with a woman for her looks/body? (Page 2)

What Girls & Guys Said

We're glad to see you liked this post.