Also, here are some MGTOW YouTube Channels I recommend listening to if you want to hear different perspectives: ThinkBeforeYouSleep & ReplicantPhish
Photo by "7esl.com" on Google
I think that's unnecessary, I mean, who is not defined by their partner is simply a person that is oriented towards individualism. But this applies to women too, I mean, individualism is not a news and it's about not belonging to any entity/group/authority/religion/dogmas, defining your own person alone by yourself. Couples where both have enough self-awareness usually work better because they understand better each other and can deal with problems and disequilibrium easily.
I find it also a bit ridiculous because it talks about "embracing masculinity", like implying that masculinity and self-value is all about being closed in yourself emotionally (lol, is that a value? The real growth would be about being able to fully share yourself and express yourself around with no need of protections and layers, and by being able to handle pain and problems by actually living them deeply inside and coming out with tools to overcome them, instead of escaping and preserving a condition of emotional ineptitude).
Being more emotionally independent is usually desiderable for who is extremely weak or ingenuous, but is there really the need of such an additional movement? Mh, well...
In all honesty, I think this is mainly useful for men that continuously feel weak, unprepared, and then even "threatened" by any source of emotional freedom, inexperienced and with so big ego lacks inside that would be actually easy to manipulate and submit, from a partner. Like being a big insensitive and practical rude man on the surface, with their inner kind inside screaming to death louder and louder, beating him to shut up, to not let others hear it. Thus, the need of such a hyper-protective and delicate movement...
For sure you can overcome these lacks by first protecting yourself a bit, I mean, if you see women as a threat then it means they really could be, for your condition, because you'd fully fall into any kind of possible emotional abuse if you are unprepared. And protecting yourself a bit could give you enough space for that, having some sort of shy attempts of opening yourself here and there but still preserving your space. But then you'd start overcoming all this only by doing experience and finding the courage to face pain and problems too, developing tools. Experience would also put off all these extremely distorted beliefs about manipulative women in couples that will only suck away your wallet (haha, what women do you expect to date, only Russian scammers? Well, they actually work well with ingenuous men like that, not really a coincidence I guess; but this is not how relationships work, it's pretty much naif to have this kind of vision, like if you don't live in the society and have no social contacts).
Sorry for kidding you a bit and also the movement itself. But yeah I find it pretty miserable and not resolved at all, I'd just say: take inspiration from that push towards individualism if you need it, but only this. Question all the rest and explore other options to accept your weakness and to manage it without repression because it would only make your life worse. Give yourself more chances, do more attempts, give yourself more patience, try to reconsider your hate/anger and to analyze it better, otherwise it would be just a suicide in my opinion. And it's full of men that succeeded that phase, so you can do that too. You're 20, don't kill yourself.
In general, mgtow isn't much different than feminism except its guys, as others said. But I remember an MGTOW on another forum (not an mgtow forum).
Some of his ideology - like slashing the tires of a woman who rejected him, setting an apartment on fire if the landlord evicted him, more or less advocating rape (including date rape), a mentality close to enforcing woman slavery, a general down-and-out hatred of women with no real cause, etc. - was appalling.
I'd like to have said he wasn't hugged enough as a kid (possible) & he was simply seeking attention but he was dogged & set with this mentality regardless of how well people argued against it. In fact, truth be told, I wouldn't have been surprised if he had a mental disorder or two.
And these sorts of mgtow guys are the ones that police are worried about. They're the extremist version & like any extremist version, they're potentially dangerous. Same with extremist feminists (I'm sure there are some "feminists" who'd scream sexual harassment if a guy simply smiles at them they're that depraved).
It is a good thing.
MGTOW can be many thing to many different people. I do my own thing, I go my own way. I do not feel the need to kiss women's asses or agree with everything they say as so many American "men" are. I was redpilled in many ways long before the term came out. Since I was in high school I remember seeing with my own eyes
how women would get soft treatment and how men would kiss their ass and defend them no matter how shitty they were. Also, being redpilled I have come to see how dangerous women are ; a women's false rape accusation and you will have to move to Siberia to start anew. Any women can accuse you of rape , any female coworker can scream sexual harrasment and you are done. Little evidence is needed in many cases. A whim, a rumor, or anything circumstantial will do. As for the family courts - they will usually favor the female- the guy will pay out of his ass for years ; alimony and child support have kept many men back. I have known a fair share of divorced guys who are living in small apartments driving an old beater while the ex-wife is living large in his nice house and driving a brand new car ( not to mention sucking off the new boyfriend ). Many ex-wives will also use the kids as pawns against the ex husbands. Prenups are jokes in most cases. The judge can toss them out if desired. In many states a judge can force you to pay child support for a kid that is not yours (I shit you not. Look it up) I avoid single moms like the dark plague.
Despite the shitty deal that men get I am surprised to see how many guys do not do their due dilligence. Have they ever read a marriage contract? Have they ever looked into divorce statistics? Have they ever looked into how family courts work and how they tend to favor the women? Have they ever looked into how employers, the police , and the media are trained to assume that any rape or sexual harrasment allegation is true , despite lack of evidence? ( there is a socialogical doctrine on this. The name eludes me though as I write this) Despite this men are still expected to"man up" and tie the knot.
I have done my due diligence and I have gathered my observations and thoughts and have concluded that going my own way is the safest, most sensible option for my own protection.
Anyone that does not like this can eat a big steaming bowl of shit and die 10,000 agonizing deaths.
@Anoniemus - It's not that it will happen, it's that it can. And even if someone weren't cutting women completely out of their lives (like me), at least they know the proper precautions to take in order to not let anyone ruin what they've built.
Seeing as how more women suffer long term in divorce (even if he has to pay child support), how she’s penalized for being a single mother in society and more, I don’t think you have a lot to worry about.
Still any man that thinks MGTOW is good is a loser in my opinion. No one should tell a man to follow an archaic code of masculinity: he should be free to do what he wants. Making sure that you aren’t fucked over is common sense: why is this suddenly something new to so many men?
A lot of what he said is garbage (divorce rates are down and the supposed causal relationship is because women are deciding to educate themselves rather than settle down early). These relationships have seen less divorce than those who marry early.
And then he’s complaining about A man paying for a child that he’s already been paying for. You can’t stop that.
Literally, guys like him are useless and definitely should be single. A walking Coronavirus that no woman should touch.
@Anoniemus
"LOL. Pussies and their fantastical imaginations. Sad."
Are you speaking for all lesbians or just yourself?
@Anoniemus
Basically what you said was: wah wah no man will pay attention to me. wah wah
In my mind it's the same problem with feminists except it's guys. You have the good ones who are fighting for equity and equality, for guys it's equality in divorce court and parental rights and such because honestly some guys get totally screwed over. And then you have the borderline militant ones who give everyone a bad name.
Ikr its feminism part two:the male edition 😂
There is nothing wrong with being a militant. In fact I embrace it: mensrightsboard.blogspot.com/search?q=militancy
@TheLittleInnocent
And it's getting bigger and more popular everyday.
@joeblow123
"There is nothing wrong with being a militant. In fact I embrace it"
^ But I imagine it's more effective when aimed properly.
Opinion
81Opinion
A man might start out with good intentions but once a group discussion forms it can breed bitterness and hostility. I've seen posts where men are so angry they say if a woman is being beaten they'd just walk by. Reddit is an interesting place with this stuff.
I honestly could not be around anyone long term that leans toward MGTOW. I think the key is everyone stays in their own lane.
I think that's the point. They are mirroring, they want you to think they sound like terrible people so you realise that the women they are mirroring are also terrible people.
That's why most of their YouTube channels consist of reading feminist articles and just repeating "Imagine the reaction if the genders were switched"
@sejla
"I've seen posts where men are so angry they say if a woman is being beaten they'd just walk by."
When women make jokes about a man getting his penis cut off by his wife then you have to expect that reaction.
"I honestly could not be around anyone long term that leans toward MGTOW."
He wouldn't get into a relationship with you anyway.
@joeblow123 Yeah I don't do those jokes. That's disturbing. If a man needs to be punished it is in a court of law but I'm sure if a man's wife or daughter was attacked he might be pretty pissed to say some things like that.
I think you are right. I doubt we could tolerate each other so it's all good.
Go your own way if you want to. It's your life, your decision. But don't bitch and whine to everyone else about it.
@AmandaYVR - What are some examples of someone that bitches and whines about it?
I respect you, Sonorous. I've been following you for a long time, shortly after joining, and so let me give this a considered reply.
What I (and I'm sure many) take issue with is not the making of the decision, or potentially even *some* of the reasons why (there is *some* validity to the push back against the dissolution and disruption of traditional gender roles), but with the proclaiming of it so loudly. Does everyone know the phrase, 'standing on your soapbox'? It's a good one. (Explained below, for those who don't know.)
I believe very much in freedom of choice. Democracy is far from perfect, but it's a reasonable idealist concept to strive for. However -
MGTOW, at its foundation (or maybe at the top of the pyramid, the final point) is saying, 'Women, we don't want you. We choose not to be with you'... which is perfectly fine. But why the hell keep shouting at us about it? I see it as graffiti - aside from the gang tagging neighbourhoods aspect (let's leave that out of it because territorial disputes are another topic), it's an expression, an opinion, a declaration about what one thinks - as an artist, an insolent, the one against the system, 'the man'... whatever. But feelings and opinions stemming from anger are no more valid than those of the rest of us, who have our own strong, yet tempered opinions about life and by contrast, do exhibit self-control in expressing them. Why should we care that they care, or don't care? I am speaking of the vocal ones. Clearly, they want us to know they're rejecting us. It's arrogant.
So that's why I say it comes down to - go, live your life. You can basically do as you please nowadays, with all these freedoms we have (well, in North America, anyway) as long as it doesn't break the law, though disrupting social harmony and creating havoc and discord is apparently acceptable. It is a human right to protest. But it can also be sellfish and not necessarily for the greater good.
[A soapbox is a raised platform on which one stands to make an impromptu speech, often about a political subject. The term originates from the days when speakers would elevate themselves by standing on a wooden crate originally used for shipment of soap or other dry goods. Soap was an essential commodity, for sale everywhere you could ship things to in the 19th century, from London mercantile establishments to the general store in Stockton, California where gold miners bought their supplies. A soap box was an exceptionally sturdy wooden crate that could stand up to being shipped halfway across the world.
To say to someone "get off your soapbox" means to stop preaching.]
"I respect you, Sonorous. I've been following you for a long time, shortly after joining, and so let me give this a considered reply."
^
Very well said! I agree with you on this. I don't know what those types are trying to accomplish at all. 😂 And it's funny because they end up look looking silly when they project their views to people that don't care about them in the first place. It's almost like some want the other person to be emotionally harmed. Like that's what some of them crave. I could see how that could feel fulfilling if they did it to a person that had previously wronged them, but adopting that attitude towards all women is just too much.
But I am all for the guys that are just trying to reach out to other guys publically, (now I know it's not but) I didn't know if that's what you were referring to in your original opinion.
I have some very complicated views that I'm not sure even want to be grouped with MGTOW now 😂 I still like the informative nature of it, in terms of what men should watch out for. But I don't like the direction that it's going in. And I don't really like the reasoning as to why a lot of people are adopting their views.
Yes. It is nice to have allies and find like-minded people, yet it's also very dangerous where groups ban together. Pitchforks can happen.
I just happen to write a question on groupthink. It's a coincidence, but it does also very much apply to the MGTOW movement.
"I could see how that could feel fulfilling if they did it to a person that had previously wronged them, but adopting that attitude towards all women is just too much." Exactly. I trust people more who think independently, not those who seek confirmation bias and safety in numbers. Mob rules, and all that.
There is complexity to this subject. But I still stand by my initial statement. Anger, bitterness, hostility, aggression towards a huge group of people (be it a gender, a race, a country, a generation, etc.) serves little purpose other than to inflame anger back. I hate generalizations that are scapegoats to real thinking. It's mental laziness. I understand making a decision to live separately, and then there is fighting for a cause, but vocal and angry and non-constructive criticisms just aren't going to work. Everyone has a right to choose to be in a relationship or not. The decision just doesn't need to be broadcast.
This is something I wish all toxic mgtows understood 😂 But they'd probably counter that with something insensitive like "freedom of speech, deal with it"
Yep.
You’ll notice I upvoted @padreflint
Here's an example of men needlessly bitching, from below:
TheFlak38@Lexxii747 -- "Im a MGTOW you dumb b*tch. Im against marriage."
What really made me laugh, out loud... yes, out loud, was how rude this guy was throughout his comments, but he just couldn't bring himself to spell out "bitch" ... because... well, that's just a curse word and it would be RUDE ? I laughed so hard... thanks !
@AmandaYVR
Women are the last ones in the world who should be complaining about someone else "bitching and whining." That is all overprivileged princesses known as feminists ever did.
@joeblow123 It doesn't make sense to assume that just because they disagree with a group, they agree with that group's natural enemy group.
@Boppy Thank you, Boppy. Exactly right.
As Sonorous says, "Don't forget that there are different types of MGTOW" and to that I would add there are also probaby different types of feminists. I have been maintaining that the word feminist has been so corrupted from its origins way back when women couldn't vote, fought for equal pay for equal work, the same political and corporate opportunities that men have always been privy to etc., but I don't have the energy to argue this anymore. Maybe there really is no longer one true feminist, but several, or at least two? I have not experienced or seen too much of the what they are now being called '4th wave' ones, though from the anger of some men online, if they are assessing fairly, I gather it's pretty bad. I also haven't experienced any problems with angry men irl, only online. And so many of them (not all, of course, but many) want to so quickly label and assume, not take the time to look at another user's profile, or even just sit with the words on the one page, and try to interpret them with a cool head.
So just to be clear again, I am against any organized group who preaches anger and hate towards others not in their tribe. I don't care what it is. JoeBlow123 is in favour of militancy but I am not. I understand anger and that not all situations may be resolved by diplomacy and tact, but I think the failure is in not trying. We must never give up speaking our minds in a constructive manner. I don't care whether that's your romantic partner, parent, child, sibling, friend, work associate, or stranger on the internet. There is far, far too little self-restraint from some people in trying to communicate these issues.
Sonorous is not one of those people. That's why I answered his question, and not the hundreds of others on this topic that I have seen come and go. Though I did come out strong on my initial comment, I realize. I did not think Sonorous was identifying as one himself. I was speaking about the angry vocal ones. I did not intend to write anything more. But I respect him for asking a follow-up question, not retorting back with an oppositional statement. He is reasonable that way. Anyway, it's gone farther than I wanted it to. I fear we could get into a danger zone here which would be caused by poorly or widely-defined labels, which as I have said before, can be so reductionist.
I am not a joiner of any group. I don't seek safety in numbers. When push comes to shove, I may choose sides, but that is as a last resort. It is a hell of a lot of work to keep assessing every person, every situation, one at a time. I know why labels exist. It's much, much easier.
@AmandaYVR
Since you mentioned me, Amanda and since you mentioned the suffragettes I thought I would post this: mensrightsboard.blogspot.com/.../...istory-of.html
@AmandaYVR - You should be a speechwriter because you took the words right out of my mouth! And also organized some of the jumbled thoughts in my head. 😂
As to why MGTOWs proclaim their separation upon soapboxes, I have a theory about that.
I believe in many cases, they're not leaving any more than Adam and Eve left Eden. They're being cast out. In many cases, women don't find them attractive and don't want them. MGTOWs, in many cases, want to make it seem as though it was a choice they made, hence they yawp it from the rooftops of the world. Like an employee about to be terminated, they shout, "Oh yeah? Well I QUIT!!!"
I think that in many cases, MGTOWs don't *want* to go their own way. They don't *want* that lifestyle.
@Bluemax Ahhh. Very insightful. Yes, this certainly seems to fit.
I have often observed this in other contexts - when people deal with adverse conditions, or have to contend with something they lack which is limiting their progress in life, they do what they can to explain and rationalize, though more importantly they must learn to adapt to the situation (you really have no choice.) And if you are seeing that person from the outside, it can often look as though they believe in this vehemently. I'd characterize it as denial + adaptability.
I remember vaguely reading somewhere about the origins of either MGTOWs or incels. I don't remember which one it was, but it actually began as an observation, that some sort of trend was occurring. It wasn't until much later that some men started identifying themselves as this, and then they organized, and some became hostile.
Thanks, Sonorous! I'm happy I could do your head justice.
I saw new activity from you (I always like that because you're so smart!) so I looked back at this post. I looked at my answer and liked it still, especially the "who gives a shit" part !! Guys go on rants about it, "catharting" (that's my own word - a combination of catharsis and farting) all over the place, as if the world gives a shit that you got burned, scorned, taken advantage of or scorned by a woman. Or that people actually CARE that you don't want a woman in your life. The only valid argument MGTOW presents in how the legal system views dividing up the wealth. As far as that goes, you have the option to get a pre-nup. I just don't care the whole darn thing. LOL. I care MORE about people misusing the term "literally" so often when they post on here!! Now THAT'S annoying !!!
I call it MFTOCEM - Men Fixin' Their Own Coffee Every Morning. Less competition for us who aren't still butt hurt about some girl in the 11th grade 20 years ago!
But being "butthurt" isn't the only reason why men are going their own way. There are more possible reasons. It's surely not mine.
Every MGTOW I ever engaged in conversation had some significant hostility towards women. Whatever your motivation, same result: less competition for us guys who love women.
There are a lot that have hostility towards women's views rather than there physical being. And you can still be mgtow and love women. 😂 For instance, some guys (like me) are temporary mgtow. Because I can't say if I'll be going my own way forever. It's just what's best for me right now.
They're not necessarily butthurt over their high school crush in the 11. th grade 20 years ago or their temporary college love, who cheated on them.
Many of them reported to be divorce raped and being sent back to poverty and nearly jumping off the bridge and have had their assets (house, car, savings etc...) legally transferred to their "ex girlfriend" as I would call them (and she also has custody over the kids).
But still in my opinion anyways it doesn't justify branding half of the earths population as devils personal minions on earth.
@Unit1 I think this comes down to needing coping skills when life gives you lemons because many women have been left by spouses high and dry without finances or they've had to leave their spouses without very little financials and didn't end up holding all men accountable for what their spouse did.
We're not talking about a girl in the 11th grade. We are talking about the here and now. It is brave men who go MGTOW. It is guys who are terrified of women that write what you did.
@joeblow123 That's what you tell yourself and that's what other MFTOCEM's tell you. Say it enough times and you can believe it.
They can knock themselves out. Doesn’t affect me as long as they leave me alone.
you hit the wall... hush.
Marriage means nothing anymore.
@stormbreaker06 let her alone and you are almost 30. So shut tf up
"they can’t get a decent woman to look at them."
This is one of the most common shit tests women use against men.
They claim that MGTOW can't get a decent woman to force us indirectly to get back to the plantation and serve another woman just to prove how wrong you are. When in reality we had enough women in our lives to realise what bitches you are in this gynocentric society and just walked away from everything in the first place. Your shit tests affect only your army of white knights.
A wife could still be a hoe. Marriage means nothing anymore, like I already stated.
@kim45456 almost 30 and still free. My life does not revolve around a female just cuz she is a grown child.
@stormbreaker06 you said she hits the wall only because she is a little above 30. You are also almost 30 and she achieved in her life more than you while you are butthurt about not getting laid
*grabs popcorn*
@kim45456
No, he's not. In fact I fully support him.
@kim45456
"So shut tf up"
Lead by example.
ROFL. No offense guys @stormbreaker06, @TheFlak38, & @joeblow123 but you couldn't play more into reasons why there are women who think men are little more than crybaby twits if an anti-man feminist wrote your responses. Talk about stupidity on your parts.
I used to enjoy following the group during a time in my life where it really helped me to understand that being single was alright, that the romantic process was unfair to men, that women had devolved into being very toxic, and that many people in relationships are less happy than single people. However, the group has become a pretty bad echo chamber, and if you defend women at any point they'll turn against you. I've gotten banned from the subreddit, and I still see really stupid stuff on there, but it's their prerogative to be like that if they want.
I forever will be grateful for being taught to weigh the value a person brings into my life versus their cost, and I think they're one of the reasons I was able to cut off my alcoholic mother.
Many men feel abused, frustrated and lonely in life, and I think they provide some kind of reassuring support.
But like I said... I don't want to be part of the retardation that thinks all women are Satan. Most women are shitty, but plenty of men are shitty, a lot of woman's shittiness is because certain men enable and encourage it, there are good men and women, and we should give each other the benefit of the doubt.
"However, the group has become a pretty bad echo chamber, and if you defend women at any point they'll turn against you. I've gotten banned from the subreddit, and I still see really stupid stuff on there, but it's their prerogative to be like that if they want."
^ That really is disappointing to hear. I've never been on one but I've heard that those forums are very toxic. Especially the incel ones. It sucks that the irrational congregate in such a public place. Then people confuse that segment with the entirety of the movement. I wish they would just go to a discord server and do all that.
"I don't want to be part of the retardation that thinks all women are Satan. Most women are shitty, but plenty of men are shitty, a lot of woman's shittiness is because certain men enable and encourage it, there are good men and women, and we should give each other the benefit of the doubt."
^ I strongly agree with that!
I sometimes think I have to go mgtow the women out there are so scary... I feel like they'll kill me 😭😂😐🙈
As a 35 year old “post wall reformed cock carousel rider”, they’re about as useless to me as I am to them. I can only speak for my experiences on GAG as I haven’t really encountered them in person, but I have been on the receiving end of their rhetoric more than once on here for merely posting a comment. After five years in the military, I’ve been insulted a far worse. It’s really quite hilarious how they think I’m supposed be insulted by being called old, useless, wall hitter, reformed slut, etc. If you really want to insult me, ask me if I ever killed someone. That’ll do it more than the red pill crap.
As for my thoughts on MGTOW, I understand where they’re coming from because there are just as much horrible women out there as there are horrible men. If anyone (male or female) wants to go their own way and not deal with marriage or relationships, that’s awesome however, I think what I find laughable about MGTOW and extreme feminism (and yes I said both equally so chill you downvote happy people) is the vitriol and anguish spewed by both groups towards the respective opposite gender. Both of them just sound like the opposite sex version of each other. Now if you’ll excuse me, I have to go tend to my condo full of kitties and boxed wine ✌🏻
@silvermoon84
Have you ever killed someone?
@joeblow124, not going to work now because I had to mention it. Sorry lol
@silvermoon84
Why did you feel you had to mention it?
Because it’s laughable how guys think I’m going to be offended by the red pill shit. Like that’s supposed to offend me. The point I was trying to make was that I’ve been insulted worse. And yes, I was waiting for the sarcastic comment so I wasn’t going to be pissed about it. Nice try though. Bye
From what I've seen, MGTOW is a motley religion without any real coherent principles. Just anyone with complaints about women can join their movement.
For example many incels can just spend money on prostitutes and call all women prostitutes and they're already welcome in a MGTOW discussion.
And then there are those who are truly screwed over by women, e. g divorced dads. I feel they are rare, most MGTOWers I've seen are just men having no success with women in real life then turn bitter. Many would instantly abandon their cause the moment some chick gives them a chance, even if it's an online relationship.
There are also the gurus. As a cope mechanism people like to see themselves as enlightened rather than a failure with women, so the gurus try to cash in on this, they provide a way to make people feel enlightened, preaching on Youtube and write self help books, they are basically Deepak Chopra but with lower IQ and higher self confidence.
There are also the monks, who have truly went their own way. They are not actual monks, but close. You won't see them on this site obviously lmao, look at the site name.
All MGTOWers see themselves as either the monk, the player or the guru, but the ones who have a G@G account and constantly seethe about women are obviously none of these.
"From what I've seen, MGTOW is a motley religion"
^ I wouldn't say "religion." Sure some people may feel superior but that's not the main goal of the ideology.
"without any real coherent principles."
^ Part of the core principals of mgtow is in the name. Men "going their own way." The principal is: When separating themselves from women in one aspect or another, life can be more beneficial. The benefits vayr from person to person because peoples goals are different.
"Just anyone with complaints about women can join their movement."
^ That's because mgtow is a place for conversation. People from all viewpoints are welcomed to discuss, but like gravitates towards like.
"For example many incels can just spend money on prostitutes and call all women prostitutes and they're already welcome in a MGTOW discussion."
^ Sounds like a toxic mgtow discussion. Another example of the diversity within the community. I certainly wouldn't want to converse with them if they generalize like that without logic to back it up.
"And then there are those who are truly screwed over by women, e. g divorced dads. I feel they are rare, most MGTOWers I've seen are just men having no success with women in real life then turn bitter. Many would instantly abandon their cause the moment some chick gives them a chance, even if it's an online relationship."
^ If they do abandon their cause, then they must not have cared that much about it in the first place. Can't save everyone. And if it doesn't work out for them, all the better for the results to show that mgtow is very beneficial. Some people need to experience it for themselves. And also their reasoning for being mgtow might influence how fast they switch. Because personally, I don't want a relationship right now, but when I'm old and bored, I may. My reason for being mgtow is to just point myself in the right direction rather than cut women off all toether. If I find a good women, I'll give her a chance. Mgtow is just directing some men on how to find the right woman for them. So they might not abandon the cause, but rather, just keep them on the backburner.
"There are also the gurus. As a cope mechanism people like to see themselves as enlightened rather than a failure with women, so the gurus try to cash in on this, they provide a way to make people feel enlightened, preaching on Youtube and write self help books, they are basically Deepak Chopra but with lower IQ and higher self confidence."
^ Well, what the gurus preach are actually valid and beneficial. Many may be a failure with women. But mgtow could help them with that. That's the reason why so many mtgtow are against pickup artists. Because they don't see the pros outweighing the cons. If men want women, it's better to focus on their career path and other things, rather than keep trying while they're at their lowest.
"There are also the monks, who have truly went their own way. They are not actual monks, but close. You won't see them on this site obviously lmao, look at the site name."
^ Okay that actually gave me a good laugh 😂
"All MGTOWers see themselves as either the monk, the player or the guru, but the ones who have a G@G account and constantly seethe about women are obviously none of these."
^ Say again?
1. Religion is a very diverse concept. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion But they have something in common:
'If you follow us, you will get many benefits... if you dont follow us, you will earn damnation, become a cuck', 'cant save everyone' do these sound familiar?
If you hear someone makes various claims about the real world such as 'take the red pills and see the reality', 'don't be a sheep' etc. but with no scientific model or peer reviewed publication, then they are preaching their religion, or a delusion. I am not calling MGTOW a theory or a philosophy, because it does not qualify as a theory, it's a bunch of claims. People who thought of it are not equipped to understand what a theory constitutes. It is important to understand that MGTOWers are not preaching about a new field, they are in fact making various claims about existing fields of social science and biology, so it's only fair that their claims have to be reviewed by people who actually study these things the scientific way.
I would stop calling them a religion the day someone in this movement actually publish a paper in a legitimate sociology/psychology journal on the behaviors and interactions of men and women, so their various claims can be subjected to the tests by people who actually understand the topics. But I don't think that is possible because MGTOW data come from anecdotes and youtube videos, and they don't seem to understand statistical inference.
2. 'Going their own way' is not a core principle of their religion
A core principle is something you take as axiom/premise to derive conclusion. 'Going their own way' is more of a peripheral conclusion, one that many MGTOWers don't even adhere to (i. e they still try to interact with women, especially on the internet).
You cannot logically deduce from 'I must go my own way' to 'all women are X', what often seen in MGTOW reasoning is the converse. You can read more here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Material_conditional
3. Just anyone with complaints about women can join their movement
"That's because MGTOW is a place for conversation. People from all viewpoints are welcomed to discuss, but like gravitates towards like."
MGTOW is a community where hate/negative opinions regarding a large group of the species is the common denominator. This is an observed fact, because it is observed in most MGTOWers. That is what gravitates them to each other, though many might like to say they don't hate women, women just can't help being those things *insert pseudo science*. Note that some other movements share this feature: e. g. the flat earth society (they really dislike mainstream physics, but they still welcome you to join and discuss physics with them :)) or, white supremacist movement (dislike other races). This is also how you develop an echo chamber and a collective blind spot of a large group.
4. "what the gurus preach are actually valid and beneficial" "Can't save everyone. And if it doesn't work out for them, all the better for the results to show that mgtow is very beneficial"
All this talk about saving people and benefits, see point 1, it's a characteristic of a religion.
What you consider beneficial aspects like self improvement, develop your own interest and hobbies unrelated to pursuing women, are ideas as old as the ancient Greeks. The original MGTOW gurus plagiarize these ideas and label them MGTOW and mix them with claims about women to suit their narrative and attract followers who are frustrated in dating, which means from the starting point their target audience is already a large group of men. And then these ideas are regurgitated to infinity by the younger gurus through various media platforms, it becomes what it is today. They can indeed easily fool the younger generation who don't have even a cursory understanding of Western philosophy. Democritus would probably laugh if he knew his dialogue between the intellect and the sense is now labelled `the red pill`, you probably think it comes from the Matrix. It's a very old topic ancient men have thought about, and a lot of these thoughts are clearly lost to the modern men. Democritus probably wouldn't expect that a derivative of his idea is now being used by some of his male descendants to quarrel with their women 😂
5. How to live a good life is a topic in philosophy
If you seek to better yourself, read more perspectives, and find an actual philosophy to practice, not the plagiarized and rehashed version. I'd suggest something like this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stoicism
Male self improvement and pursuing their own path had existed centuries before MGTOW, people who are capable of doing so do not need to be told how to do so by some gurus. Also if you look at history you might figure out what truly is the cause of MGTOW, it is not self improvement or the desire to better the self, it's a reaction to feminism.
The way to understand something is to try to understand what opposing sides are saying, not by following one of them and only seek evidence that support your view. It's the difference between knowing something and fooling yourself into believing you know something. So I think it might be in your interest to read this plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-philosophy/
Yes, I know it is fashionable for people these days to hate feminism, but how many of these new age religious anti feminist practitioners actually understand feminism, the thing they define themselves as the opposite of?
I am most certainly not a feminist, but I can tell you right now the fact is that feminism is a legitimate philosophy. It is well defined and coherent enough to be discussed in philosophy textbooks for undergraduates, while MGTOW is not even close, it's not even good enough to be analyzed and criticized by philosophers or social scientists.
"Mgtow is just directing some men on how to find the right woman for them. So they might not abandon the cause, but rather, just keep them on the backburner"
lol
To close in a positive note, I think you seem like a positive guy, and you're young, so perhaps it's okay to be part of something like this. MGTOWers I've seen on the internet are typically different though.
Good luck.
(1a) Okay, you do have good points. 😂 By definition, it's a religion. I think the only reason it caught me off-guard is because I didn't know the official definition of religion. Because when I think of religion, I think of the "follow our way because it is the best, true, and only way to a righteous life" types that always have a God as their focal point.
(1b) "I am not calling MGTOW a theory or a philosophy, because it does not qualify as a theory, it's a bunch of claims."
^ Why wouldn't you call it a theory? It may not be an official scientific theory with extensive research but doesn't it still qualify as an "idea used to account for a situation or justify a course of action?" Even if you were only talking about the mgtows that assert rather than infer, I still think it's their theory. And the strength of that theory would depend on how logical their supporting arguments are, right?
(1c) "People who thought of it are not equipped to understand what a theory constitutes."
^ What does it constitute?
(1d) "So it's only fair that their claims have to be reviewed by people who actually study these things the scientific way."
^ That's what I would like to happen. But I'd definitely need someone smarter than me to do the study, and someone smarter than me to explain the study to me in layman's terms. 😂
(2a) 'Going their own way' is not a core principle of their religion
^ That's why I said "part of the core principals of mgtow is in the name."
(2b) A core principle is something you take as axiom/premise to derive conclusion. 'Going their own way' is more of a peripheral conclusion, one that many MGTOWers don't even adhere to. You cannot logically deduce from 'I must go my own way' to 'all women are X', what often seen in MGTOW reasoning is the converse.
^ We agree on this! I think that's such a silly thing to do. I'm not the type to say all anyone is anything. I hate that people even have that mindset. 😂
(2c) "They still try to interact with women, especially on the internet."
^ I'm that way, but I'm still going my own way. I don't go out of my way to do it though. I also don't plan on getting into any committed relationships, but I'd definitely be willing to sleep with a woman. I interact with a woman, but I don't want to make them the focus of my life/motivations.
(3) "MGTOW is a community where hate/negative opinions regarding a large group of the species is the common denominator. This is an observed fact, because it is observed in most MGTOWers. That is what gravitates them to each other, though many might like to say they don't hate women, women just can't help being those things *insert pseudo science*."
^ I will agree that the fuel to join is from past negative experiences or avoiding potential negative experiences. Some may view it as a way to bicker about women, but I don't. I tend to gravitate towards the gurus that are more logical. Like instead of them claiming something with no evidence, they'll give examples and explain their viewpoints with those examples in mind. I also like the ones that are open to discussion, rather than echoing the same thing over and over again. Because, (and I'm sure you can tell based on my replies to you) I like a challenge! 😂
(4a) What would you prefer people study/practice to replace mgtow?
(4b) "What you consider beneficial aspects like self improvement, develop your own interest and hobbies unrelated to pursuing women, are ideas as old as the ancient Greeks."
^ So what if I have beliefs that fall under that category of both stoic and mgtow? Stoicism encompasses the whole pain & pleasure thing. But mgtow just specifies the biggest problem I'm having. The pain & pleasures of relationships. And the discussions about the problem are relevant to what is happening today. What current men are experiencing in the dating world. And it isn't just about the fact that men don't like the way women act, there are other things like "marriage laws" they'd want to be changed.
(5a) "If you seek to better yourself, read more perspectives, and find an actual philosophy to practice, not the plagiarized and rehashed version."
^ What if I keep both in mind? Because although I haven't studied it in its entirety, I have heard about stoicism. And I do agree with majority of what I've heard. But I also agree with some people that identify as mgtow. That very well may be because they have stoic beliefs. But if they just label their stuff as mgtow without claiming to have created the thought processes, is it all that bad? Because it's still a discussion about stoic related topics. They just go more in-depth about what's currently happening in the dating world.
(5b) The way to understand something is to try to understand what opposing sides are saying, not by following one of them and only seek evidence that support your view. It's the difference between knowing something and fooling yourself into believing you know something. So I think it might be in your interest to read this
plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-philosophy/
^ I strongly agree with that! I tell my mother this everytime we get on the topic of her religion. 😂 And thanks for the link, I'll check it out!
(5c) "lol"
^ What's so funny? 😂
(5d) "To close in a positive note, I think you seem like a positive guy, and you're young, so perhaps it's okay to be part of something like this. MGTOWers I've seen on the internet are typically different though."
^ Thanks! And I want no part of the bad side of mgtow!
I understand the basis of it. In the minds of many men, dating, relationships and marriage no longer seem worth effort, time and treasure. This is caused by the various waves of feminism and fatherless households where maleness is suppressed. The #metoo mentality has put a final knife in it by causing ruthless, angry SJW young women to be an existential threat against men, careers, family and the quality of life in general. Confronting this is difficult because lawyers, the courts and pop culture in general present men as patriarchs when they are actually in decline.
Many men have finally reached the point where the pool of available women are unworkable and relationships and sexuality are no longer worth the effort, expense and risk. These men are in retreat and they do harm to our culture by not fighting back and retaking the leadership role that is in their DNA. So they go their separate ways.
My version going my own way has been to stem out of the pop culture world.
No social media (except GAG!). No cable TV. I've cut off Netflix. I am with a foreign national who is repelled by the feminist world view. We run a retro, traditional household and seek out life's simple pleasures and permanent things.
Men should aggressively seek out partners from among the billion or more eligible East Asian and Latin American to replace the feminism-infected women they flee from.
When I wake up to her sweet disposition and moderate world view, I feel like I am cheating fate every day,
It is based on the fact that men are becoming aware that the laws, family courts, the media, schools, colleges, and the workplace are extremely bias in favor of women to the detriment of men. Bias in favor of women is normal because, throughout history, men have always protected women. Men die fighting to protect women. Women don't die fighting to protect men. And, in wars, it is men, not women, that are killed in large numbers.
However, even though bias in favor of women has been the norm throughout all human history, in modern times, the bias has become so extreme that some men are saying, "that's enough already."
Ultimately, men are in charge and the only rights women have are rights enforced by men. If the overwhelming percentage of men decide to reverse things, the women are powerless to prevent it. In Iran, under the Shaw, women had many rights--rights that were enforced by men. After the revolution, most of their rights were taken away and there was nothing the women could do to prevent it.
Women cannot possibly fight men. Give me an army of 1,000 men vs. an army of 10,000 women, including commanders, and I would give 10 to 1 odds and put my money on the men.
In theory, it's fine, no skin off my back. But in practice, men I've run into who are part of this are angry at women to the point that existing in a shared space with them is enough to set them off.
Nice to see someone who is part of it but not instantly on the offensive. Good luck on your journey of self discovery.
"Men I've run into who are part of this are angry at women to the point that existing in a shared space with them is enough to set them off."
^ gOoD gOd 😂 Yeah those are the types that I would definitely not associate with! Seems that they are just so caught up in their emotions rather than seeing the greater good that can come out of maintaining a peaceful resistance.
"Nice to see someone who is part of it but not instantly on the offensive. Good luck on your journey of self-discovery."
^ Thanks for your kind words! 🙏
This is what i tried to say the other day and got shouted down for it. Some guys are a-holes and some women are b****es. So if women run into one guy whose MGTOW and verbally abusive they conclude all MGTOW are by extension. It's as fair as me concluding all women on G@G are b****es just because i've run ino maybe a 1/2 dozen of them or so.
Nothing you can do if people choose to cling to ignorance.
@ChiTown33 I didn't say all men. Or most. I said the men I have met who were MGTOW acted this way. It's refreshing to see someone like OP who isn't like that, as it's a first for me. Not sure how this is such an issue for you.
But it is really like that. I also have met plenty of sexist mgtow guys on the internet for almost 3 years. They say they go their own way but make youtube videos in where they say how bad and useless women are or women should be replaced by sex dolls/ sex robots etc. I was 17-18 the first time i have discovered them , it destroys my confidence a little bit and life expectations. I literally cried while I was watching mgtow videos who said to me i am useless hahah. Since then i avoid youtube and another social networks like reddit where these guys gather around
@kim45456
Now you know how the 17-18 year old young man feels when he sees women telling him he is a rapist and how he is an oppressor of women and that he is evil. They laugh with glee as they talk about castrating or killing him. His confidence takes a nosedive too.
@joeblow123 uhm, but that's the problem joe. Men aren't supposed to feel things except when a woman wants him to. What you're saying isn't going to compute with her because nothing a woman says or does is ever supposed to affect him.
I used to watch a lot of MGTOW content some four or so years ago - I think I've seen it all at this point because the only reason I stopped was because they were just retreading what I've already heard - women bad this, women bad that and etc.
MGTOWs have a lot of good points about society, for sure, but I can't see myself as part of that kind of pessimistic thinking - even though I'd have every reason to indulge.
Yeah, I'm starting to wonder if I even fall under the mgtow category. Because even though I have similar beliefs as some, I don't agree with what a lot of people define to be mgtow. So I wish there were better groupings. Because my situation is a lot more complex than "fuck women I'm never dating."
A bunch of disparate guys that are fed up with the dogmatic politics that openly pervades modern society. Some have been previously burned, others are trying to avoid future catastrophies given the unequal framework in the current society.
Their teachings may have been of more interest to me as a young man, just don't take them as religious doctrine as the zealots tend to do.
I agree with you on that! People should definitely view it as a good choice rather than the best one for them!
They would be quite alright if they didn't demonize women as the evil in it's pure form, who are out there to destroy men and society. From what I've seen they've mostly been the same butthurt losers as the insane feminazis, fueling the gender wars.
What ever has happened to just opt out and keep calm like they have vowed to?
no offense but you asked.
It really does suck to hear that many mgtows are like that. It's similar to how incels are perceived. Inceldom partially has a negative light because the face of it is always the bad ones. Those are the ones that get the most attention. And there isn't a strong face that can establish enough order to not let the bad ones lash without reassurances to others that it's not the intended way of doin things.
They still got pretty cool stuff to build up men and how to not fall for the traps of gold diggers or leeches, who use you for free meals but when it reaches the point of demonizing, undermining or attacking women, that's where they're literally no better than the rabid feminazis, who stomp on men, thinking it's "female empowerment".
Yeah, I agree with you on that!
its funny because in the beginning men just dragged the women by the hair to the cave if they liked the girl but now guys are protesting something they allowed to happen due to west coast influences which is the worst thing a guy could do.
iv been doing it my way since i was a kid in the 70's the new movement is just a joke for women to laugh at guys nothing more. if guys want to change things go back to calling a women a bitch or some other word to draw a line and not run away to the freaking circus too show the girl who is boss.
i can't believe guys actually do this crap lol
"but now guys are protesting something they allowed to happen due to west coast influences which is the worst thing a guy could do."
^ You do realize that the men that are going there own way had no say in whatever influences altered the course of the world. That's something all of society has to do. It can't be pinpointed to one cause because everything is so complex!
" if guys want to change things go back to calling a women a bitch or some other word to draw a line and not run away to the freaking circus too show the girl who is boss."
^ That would be a harmful way to change. A lot of mgtow don't want more drama. They just want peace.
and they could have it if they just expressed there self instead of hoping there words, emotions or message was not accepted by a frowning public who does not care about said guy. i mean back in the late 70's early 80's there was no lets just be friends or please dont offend me or i will cry or be passionate about something the world will never see or recognize.
and it may sound like other things going on but its basically guys , even if some of those guys wear a dress... but i won't go there for obvious reasons.
i mean once you comfortable with yourself nothing else should matter , not even the negative influences that drive today's guys int moving away from things. that only proves they prefer walking away instead of confronting the problem and trying to solve it.
they are giving women more back bone than they deserve women are no more of an obstacle than climbing a wall, and they can say we can cut sex off from you if you dont agree , hell lady i have been good for 28 years with just my hand that is just am empty threat
@kim45456 lol no it isn't that , its the whole movement thing its out of hand, i used the cave man metophor as an example of hpw it was compared to knw. not really saying draging women by the hair is a good thing but guys were way more voice full and up front about things than they are now. and yeah what i said sounds harsh or maybe living in the past but you learn from the past both good and bad. and that guy movement is an example of not doing it the right way.
i see nothing wring with how guys are , i mean you got your morons that say no means yes because there sister or mom always said no but for the most part guys are are not gonna care about this fluff you hear women complain about.
but with how good some women are at manipulating supposedly open minded men guys suddenly decide to wonder off into the wild to be one with there spirit animal or whatever it is that these young guys do lol.
@kim45456 i am with you on that , guys have really dropped in respect and intellect in recent years. you have your decent guys bt there over looked and you hear more about the jerks who wet there beds lol.
The guys who legitimately just want to do their own thing and focus on themselves for a while? No problem I respect them taking that time for self reflection.
The guys who are just incels hiding under the MGTOW banner, they are toxic.
Agreed!
Being in a culture that supports boys being gay and trans is worse. We have monks here for centuries. MGTOW is not new for me. However, now more and more boys would like to have their penises cut off even they're just 16, never learn about girls, and girls love to men go gay. (There are boy bands with fangirls who would be aggressive and beyond if their crush likes any girls, more gay series on air than before; not as many lesbian series.)
I believe one day guys who go their own ways will grow up and improved.
I like the vid: Geek Love with a young men who lives with an overprotective mom. This is a very good example of how weak or toxic father (cheating husbands who leave their wives) would effect their kids. Thanks.
I've known about this movement for a while and I find it very sad. and in hindsight I could see both sides of why they want to do this. some men have been screwed over by the justice system when it comes to paying child support for their children after a divorce. but the other half of the men also just don't want to put in the effort of attracting a woman and so they're like the ugly rejects of society and then they blame women for that. so I don't know it's a mixed bag of all different types of men that are going their own way. but I believe men should step up to the plate right now women have been doing this doing this and men are falling behind. look up Jordan Peterson on YouTube he agrees on this that men need to step up.
Dear MGTOW,
Please, by all means go your own way already. You insist on lecturing women about how useless, horrible, and destructive we are to you based on your personal experiences with 'a few women' and neglect to even recognize your own part in all of that and that there are an equal amount of crappy men out there who have done equally bad crap to women. Irony. For men who claim to have such a distaste for women, you sure do talk about us A LOT. You have whole websites dedicated to us, you bring it up at every turn, and I fail to see how happy you actually are since you seem to dwell in the so called misery of life that women have created for you. No one is holding you back or down from exporting all traces of feminine energy from your life. Do not reproduce. End your line with you. Die happy with all the money you will allegedly have because that's the most important thing in life.
Positive but also not sustainable in the long run.
They know that it’s not meant to be for everyone or last forever. It’s more of a “weather the storm” strategy, but I think they are spreading attitudes that will ultimately manifest in positive ways and the do it without violent protests or anything like that, kinda neat.
Yeah, I agree for the most part.
I got through most of the video, what I would be concerned about is the need for a genuine connection. The second solution has the problem that maybe we simply can’t conceptualize these things in a way that could result in a truly emotionally satisfying outcome. You would need good AI to pull it off and then who knows what other issues could occur. If the AI gets to a good enough point to provide emotionally and socially satisfying outcomes then I wonder why the AI would stick around.
I think men and women will all turn to robotic companionship and then the machines will abandon us and we’ll be zoo animals at best.
Anyway, what I was saying was that I think ultimately MGTOW will have a positive effect on men and women and we won’t need to go the second route.
" I think they are spreading attitudes that will ultimately manifest in positive ways and the do it without violent protests or anything like that, kinda neat."
^ I'm so glad I haven't seen mgtows that are violent. If that ever happens, I hope the mgtow voices loudly express their disappointment towards the behavior.
"Anyway, what I was saying was that I think ultimately MGTOW will have a positive effect on men and women and we won’t need to go the second route."
^ I hope it does as well! And thanks for your opinion!
It's not a movement , movements have a leadership cadre , an offline presence , and often funding of some sort , feminism meets these definitions , it has a ( universally misandrist ) leadership cadre , very well funded , also , the rank and file never call out their leaders. MGTOW it is only a very loose online only collective , but my view is , why bitch and moan about women... what's the point? Single dad , that has chosen to stay single... and from a woman's POV , she will NOT desire a single dad , and cannot blame women either... there are far more available men than women , mostly without my " baggage " . I put myself into this situation... I dumped my ex wife and took majority custody.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions