But he is super old and not right in the head
I've been hearing that...
Thank you for the MHO 😊
I voted for her she’s my favorite 🤩
@Tea-Spaghetti I'd take her over any dirty Trumptard.
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
She is from Hawaii and she is more progressive than the other Democrats. She is pro weed, anti war, pro Medicare for All, support Bernie over Hillary Clinton, etc
Yeah, but she was also pro life for a while. And while that is a bad thing, in general, a Democrat with a pro life history (even if its just history) could go over quite well in iowa.
She supported Bernie during the 2016 election. I do not think she is a right winger
I didn't say she was a right winger. I said she is slightly right of center. Or at least most of the libertarians I know consider her to be one of their own. And while that could be the result of misinformation, that can't be the entire explanation.
I bet you hate Yang, AOC, Nina Turner and Bernie as well
I don't hate them. I just don't agree with their ideas cause I'm not a progressive. I think the Democratic party will continue to move in that direction but it isn't going to happen tomorrow no matter how many times you repeat yourself and ask the same question or make the same comment for the 250th time. And your constantly bringing up Nina Turner as somehow qualified to be leader of the free world never fails to make me laugh.
Are you a blue dog? You know that the blue dogs got their ass whooped this year? Many Republicans beat the blue dogs
200+ won and 5 or 6 lost. Is that how you define many? 200+ blue dogs as you call them won reelection. 5 or 6 progressives won as well but 1 out of 25 Democratic house members means you guys aren't running tbe party quite yet. And in case you weren't able to understand the dynamics of why those Dems lost their seats, it's because Republicans were able to taint those candidates with their propaganda as being controlled by socialists even though they weren't. The fear of the AOCs and the Bernies are why those candidates lost. So thanks a lot for that. You and people like you helped the Democratic party lose house seats and probably fail to gsin senate control. So congratulations. Goid job.Of course as you've already said 500 times, you'd like to blow up the Democratic party so honestly I place zero value in what you think would be best.
They called AOC and rest of the squad won their races and the Republicans called them socialists
Because they ran in districts that have been heavily dominated by Democrats for years. Not every Congressional district is like that. Many Dems won seats in 2018 that were swing districts or had tradtionally voted Republican. They're the ones that were susceptible to the smear, not people who run in districts that the Democratic candidate always wins 70-30 since forever. Do you understand the difference?
Katie Porter is a progressive and she won twice in a district that was always Republican
Katie Porter has aligned herself on some issues with the progressives like Medicare for all and wears a progressive label but she hasn't lined up on every issue. She supports making college affordable for all, but not free. Regardless, she is an attorney who's clerked for a number of prominent judges, was a law school professor, worked as a Consumer protection attorney and was appointed to roles as a consumer watchdog in Caliifornia by Kamala Harris. She may align herself with the progressives on some issues but her background is as mainstream as it gets. And she endorsed Elizabeth Warren for president, not Bernie. It would be almost impossible for the Republicans to pigeonhole her as a socialist/radical/communist cause her background is so mainstream. Not so with many other candidates. She's the exception, not the rule. And that's your problem with the way you think about these things. You see a group of 20, see one exception and you think that proves your case. It doesn't and in almost every case, things are more nuanced, complicated and grey than your view of the world allows for which always seems to be either black or white.
But Saudi Arabia attacked us on 911Also the countries with the best healthcare systems all have Medicare for All and plus wars are awful
I'm not against being hard on Saudi Arabia, I'm just more concerned with Russia/China. That doesn't mean it would scale well here. We also have fatter, less healthy people so I think the tax burden to fund it would be greater. I would rather see efforts to reduce costs if possible rather than make everything free. Like are prices expensive because they actually cost a lot or are pharmaceuticals and hospitals artificially jacking up the prices because they can? If its the latter Id prefer to adress that instead of just funding everything with taxes.Or if it really has to be free can't we trial it in a state like California or NY first instead of just rolling it out for the whole country.
69% of Americans want Medicare for Allthehill.com/.../494602-poll-69-percent-of-voters-support-medicare-for-all
Even a Fox Poll has it 72% of Americans want Medicare for All www.commondreams.org/.../centrist-house-democrats-attack-medicare-all-fox-news-poll-shows-72-voters-want
The thing with polls is that how the question is phrased matters a lot. If you ask people if they support free healthcare then sure most will say yes. However if you provide specifics on how it will afect their individual tax burden I suspect less would be in favor of it. I mean if it is really going to be funded purely by Millionaires & Billionaires then I guess I am cool with it. However if it requires raising taxes for middle class workers then I suspect there would be a lot more opposition.
I support China and North Korea haha and also the U. S...
Easy stop spending money on useless wars and throwing people in prison for stupid reasons
Between these two, Tulsi is more an independent. The swamp hates her
I love that the populist candidate is beating the status quo candidate same with my Andrew Yang vs Joe Biden question
From what I've seen that's not her style
You know blue anon that her style is to end the wars and make weed legal. Also to give people healthcare
Well, like I said... if she runs a better campaign. Her genitals don’t matter.It’s when a female acts like Hitler’y clinton and pushes the gender card that they prove their uselessness.Right now she seems like a good candidate, we will see when the time comes.
She is way better than Biden. If she was the president, there would be no more wars, we would finally have Medicare for All, and weed would be legal nationwide!!
She’s also an idiot :/ and you do realize she can’t unilaterally do jack shit, right?
You think she is more an idiot than Biden is lol
Nope, about the same level of stupid lol
You know that Tulsi is winning?
Now she is, yes lol
She is better, she pissed off Hillary Clinton lol
Lol so what?
Little Marco lol
He has small hands but what else do we have lying Ted?
They both suck and part of the swamp!!!
There’s nobody else out there
Better than Kamala Harris
I also dislike Kamala and Biden. Throw all in prison and put populists like Andrew Yang in power
So a freaking Mormon or Kasich who is part of the establishment lol.Well both are part of the establishment so they suck
Both are better than filthy Trump who sucks way harder.
Both the Democrats and the Republicans hate her
Right, but Republicans wouldn't propose the gun control she likes. She'd keep the military from engaging in unnecessary conflicts. She'd veto their crazy spending bills and they'd not propose her crazy spending ideas.
Lol what does that means