That can be the case, but then, men have no reason to have to pay for that child either. If you argument is that fatherhood has no legal value, then no women should ever be complaining about child support either. She assumes full responsibility of the child, and has to actually assume FULL RESOINSBIILITY of the child.
The only thing I hate from women are their double-standards about the man having no right to his unborn child, but expected to cough up the cash for the next 18 years anyway. And I don't even support absentee fathers, per se.
@MCheetah When an unborn child, who is still in his/her mother's womb, has an abortion without his/her father's permission, all men always raise the issue of alimony in response to the abortion. Not every woman finds it right for a man to pay alimony. Please do not come to these comments with this defense anymore. Abortion = alimony, abortion = alimony, ... What a silly comparison.
All I said is, if the woman "should have 100% of the right to abort," then you're arguing that fatherhood has no validity, and if so, the man has no obligations to that child in any way either. Which I don't find favorable, but is at least actually fair. I think men DESERVE some legal voice to protect that child, even if it's lesser than the woman's, as women do not reproduce asexually and more often than not, it's the father's DNA that forms the majority of that child post-birth.
Otherwise, like I said, the woman is free to assume full responsibility of the child. They just should not burden men to alimony while also claiming men have zero rights to their own children. That is all.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
19Opinion
Only if by some medical miracle the become pregnant.
*they
They should at the very least decide not to pay child support for that child.
No, not abortion.
But you should at least be able to abandon the kid, if they get to kill it.
Sometimes, but some men do it just to be assholes and have no plans to help care for the baby!
Yes they should!! The baby is half theirs!
I think only women have a say in this matter.
That can be the case, but then, men have no reason to have to pay for that child either. If you argument is that fatherhood has no legal value, then no women should ever be complaining about child support either. She assumes full responsibility of the child, and has to actually assume FULL RESOINSBIILITY of the child.
The only thing I hate from women are their double-standards about the man having no right to his unborn child, but expected to cough up the cash for the next 18 years anyway. And I don't even support absentee fathers, per se.
@MCheetah When an unborn child, who is still in his/her mother's womb, has an abortion without his/her father's permission, all men always raise the issue of alimony in response to the abortion. Not every woman finds it right for a man to pay alimony. Please do not come to these comments with this defense anymore. Abortion = alimony, abortion = alimony, ... What a silly comparison.
All I said is, if the woman "should have 100% of the right to abort," then you're arguing that fatherhood has no validity, and if so, the man has no obligations to that child in any way either. Which I don't find favorable, but is at least actually fair. I think men DESERVE some legal voice to protect that child, even if it's lesser than the woman's, as women do not reproduce asexually and more often than not, it's the father's DNA that forms the majority of that child post-birth.
Otherwise, like I said, the woman is free to assume full responsibility of the child. They just should not burden men to alimony while also claiming men have zero rights to their own children. That is all.
They should discuss it with their partners
Yes, but not the final say.
yes , they put it in there
No lmao.
Nope. Only women can decide about it.
I agree more with the other two ladies then yours I’m afraid.
If it’s both parents responsibility for the child it should be a joint decision
Yes, let me get my coat hunger...
Hanger
Yeah
I think so yes
No. Her body.