Or do you know someone who believes that earth is flat?
Do you believe that earth is flat?
Or do you know someone who believes that earth is flat?
@ΉOMO_乇尺乇CTU丂 @Redstang88 @skeptic002
I figured instead of arguing in your thread any more, I'd just post here what I told skeptic before.
you are demanding "physical evidence" to the contrary of the passages you've quoted? If so, where is the physical evidence proving that those passages were written found by someone with physical evidence to prove them? There is physical evidence of the "chain of evidence," so to speak, of how that text has been passed down, all while being 100% accurately translated into a dozen different languages over time that do not directly translate to one another? Demanding physical evidence to the contrary is predicated on having solid physical evidence to begin with. For instance, I can say I ran a mile. You have a reliable measurement system to both accurately measure where I started and ended, as well as do that reliably over any terrain or any size gait or other variable. I'm wondering if you are implying that your quotes are your physical evidence? If so, how do you account for the limitations of the reliability, credibility, and inherent error?
In other words, I don't think it's necessary to prove your hypothesis wrong with physical evidence. The underlying theory behind your hypothesis is flawed, due to uncontrolled variables that have been overlooked and therefore not controlled for. If the theory is flawed to begin with, you have to first correct that with control over variables, so they won't produce unwanted error in your conclusions. How do you plan to control for the variable of time since that was written? Who it was written by? Using what physical evidence was it written? Has it been accurately translated with 100% certainty? Once those variables are controlled for, then and only then, is it reasonable to begin demanding proof for any opposing hypothesis. Not before.
If you are going to skip steps in your "science" and demand physical proof, you have to start by addressing the uncontrolled variables in your theory.
You hit the nail on the head with these two simple phrases in your response to me. "Stories." And "maybe it happened." The problem is, you have skipped over this, and have demanded physical proof against something you haven't proven. So, you're essentially having others do the science for you, only backwards. You are asking that we, people who have a different idea, provide you with proof against your idea. Which you would then attempt to use, to piece together your own argument. Using others evidence against, in order to argue your idea which shifts in definition, isn't science. It's backwards science, and is questionable at best.
I am keeping it as simple and logical as it can get. By using science, and the necessary requirements for scientific proof. You are using stories, interpretations, and translations. You are demanding to disprove something you haven't proven to begin with. It's skipping steps. For us to begin to compare science, we would both have to be working with science. You are confusing religion, spirituality, and faith, with science. Which is perfectly fine. As long as you realize that's what you're doing. I have no qualms with religion, spirituality, or faith. I take issue with them being used to either support or discount, science.
talk like a regular human being stop trying to sound super smart speak in a normal manner
now you say you require proof from my side and that I all have are writings
okay lets go :) physcial evidence from both sides if we make a statement prove it physically
just ask me a question about the bible
murder, genocide, angels, GOD, the crazy stories of splitting water so they could cross, go for it ask me 1 question at a time
im ready
let's start off with Genesis
@skeptic002 roflmao. Nah, I thought you wanted to have an intelligent debate? Why would I dumb down the debate, and why do you suppose I'm not capable of being smart enough to argue the way I am?
Here's an idea. Raise your argument. When you stop trying to argue that you can prove stories, when you are able to stop being so rigidly intolerant of science and opposing proof, and then demanding that all of us do your science for you, I'd be happy to continue.
no the Question is are these stories true assuming there fake right from the start is dumb
CONDEMNATION BEFORE INVESTIGATION IS THE HEIGHT OF IGNORANCE
have you looked it up?
have you researched it?
the Bible says a lot of crazy things same with many other historical documents
the Greek text says Zeus came down from Olympus and had sex with many women of the earth the women are said to have given birth to the Titans or what they would call giants
thesecondachilles.files.wordpress.com/.../image.jpg
so there should be some evidence for it
www.talkpundit.com/.../footprint-31.jpg
do you think someone just carved it in there
ekladata.com/ewh9cWj9SX20kl_kShhR-SH6PAA.jpg
do you think this is fake
www.6000years.org/graphics/arabiangiantman.jpg
or maybe this story
calmcrash.files.wordpress.com/.../...feet-tall.jpg
so what's fake and whats real?
the Sons of Satan vs the Sons of Christ
hallofbeorn.files.wordpress.com/.../...60x1600.jpg
@skeptic002 what does make these obviously photoshopped photos any more legit than Nasa'so videos and photos?
https://blog.drwile.com/?p=10531
https://blog.drwile.com/?p=15827
I'm sorry you take pictures at face value, that's exactly the opposite of scientific, or proof of any kind. Better quote for you-
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts."
The problem is, you have to use science to investigate your stories. And that's what you refuse to do, which is why your argument fails before it can even begin.
Research your "footprints," your pictures, your stories. Tell me what science says, rather than skipping science altogether and slapping down random pictures and shouting "see!!!" What I see remains. Your dogmatic, and repetitive, stories. Not science.
I said physical evidence disprove the stuff I posted is not real
I have read those post before already they do not have an answer
the only thing they can say is erosion if you believe erosion made that lol good luck
its extremely rare that it could happen
so these are erosion also especially the ones in caves right lol see use your eyes accept what you see
www.thelivingmoon.com/.../Footprint_005.jpg
https://s8int.com/images5/footprint-kansas2.jpg
www.bibleandscience.com/.../footprint2.jpg
s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/.../...23350ca07d.jpg
www.bibleandscience.com/.../footprint1.jpg
greaterancestors.com/.../P1020977.jpg
Lol. You've again, missed my point completely. As for accepting your pictures as anything like what you claim, not going to happen. Re read the articles. It is not simply erosion. That's one component, along with the type of rock, the impossibility of a foot making that, and erosion.
Have a good rest of your day. Hope you do some real, open minded reading.
you are not first person to show me this I have gone through this soooooo many times
you say you are so scientific but you deny what you see
that's not scientific that's lying to yourself
use common sense that is a giant foot print and if my guess is correct there is a giant skeleton under there or they took it out already
either one will do
see that is common sense
No, that's utterly ridiculous. Not common sense. Science is about investigating what you think you see. Lying to yourself is thinking you see a footprint, so there couldn't possibly be any alternative explanation. Common sense implies "sense." Not confirmation bias.
now lets assume that foot print is erosion like they say what do I do with all the other ones that are not erosion?
now what should you do with this? why is it so close?
pics.onsizzle.com/...les-away-how-are-12556540.png
or maybe this one the firmament why is it there?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAcp3BFBYw4
www.metabunk.org/.../
Basic science. Again. Yay, science.
Your video, does not come along with any calculations, measurements, or scientific evidence that it did anything other than travel into the sky, then stop. That's what rockets do. They either reach orbit and pass through the gravitational pull back to earth, or they run out of fuel, hover for a moment, then fall. Your video shows nothing to suggest anything unusual happened.
hahaha lol that's a joke here let me give you a better one
the bible does not say the sun is a fire burning brightly in the sky with different elements
it calls it a light how could anyone prove the elements of the sun they can not
they can not touch it and take it with them and examine them
so the earth is made of iron ore to an extent which is magnetic now what if the sun has magnetic qualities to it which hold it up in the sky and cause it to rotate and GOD leaves it on 24/7
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQ_E81_hJjU
makes more sense then a piece of tape attached to card board
Well, you acknowledge that celestial bodies can rotate now. I'm not sure if we can call that progress, but possibly.
Of course the Bible doesn't call it fire or acknowledge it's composition. It is a storybook. Written long before anybody knew that anything was made up of chemicals, or had any idea about elements. Makes sense that without modern science, they wouldn't talk about modern science like they knew it. That's absurd.
Yes, the Sun & Earth have magnetic fields. I'm glad too, because we get the Auroras from them. And they are stunningly beautiful. Once again, fuck yeah... science.
You don't have to take a piece of the Sun to learn it's composition. Here you go... the entire history of how science learned what the Sun is made of. For the record, I'd love to see the Japanese Super-Kamiokande (Super-K) detector in person.
www.BBC.com/.../20160128-how-do-we-know-what-stars-like-our-sun-are-made-of
What I gave you was a simplified experiment. Obviously, extrapolation. Yay science.
BE CAREFUL WITH YOUR WORDS
Written long before anybody knew that anything was made up of chemicals, or had any idea about elements
GENETICS OF THE ANCIENT PAST
s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/.../...b728b03dcd.jpg
BOOK OF JASHER 4:18
And their judges and rulers went to the daughters of men and took their wives by force from their husbands according to their choice, and the sons of men in those days took from the cattle of the earth, the beasts of the field and the fowls of the air, and taught the mixture of animals of one species with the other, in order therewith to provoke the Lord; and God saw the whole earth and it was corrupt, for all flesh had corrupted its ways upon earth, all men and all animals
But Noah found grace in the eyes of the LORD
Matthew 24:37
as it was in the days of Noah so shall it be at the coming of the son of man
do not talk about history if you know nothing of it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LV-bOtvpuZw&t=45s
www.geek.com/.../
Allen radiation belts and now a prominent group of them want those belts DEAD It’s understandable, given the frustration these areas of space can cause to modern astrophysicists; if you want to launch a satellite or telescope, let alone a human being, the Van Allen belts will be a painful thorn in your side. So, says a growing group of astrophysicists, why not WIPE THEM OUT altogether? It might seem odd to hear scientists propose destroying a feature of the natural world, but there is a decent scientific argument to be made that these belts provide us nothing useful, and that we could lose them without a single negative effect.
SO THEY WANNA DESTROY THE FIRMAMENT JUST LIKE NIMROD
INVISIBLE PLASMA SHIELD ABOVE EARTHS SURFACE
www.ibtimes.com/invisible-plasma-shield-which-protects-earth-radiation-discovered-7200-miles-above-1730214
WHY NOT SHOOT A MISSILES AT IT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8jVJR9zSEs&t=5s
hun the earth is flat enjoy
If u know anything about Christopher Columbus, everyone who knows their History, knows, he was the one who discovered America. And when he had sailed the ocean blue, he found out the world was not flat.
Your globe is round, but this helps you see it on a big ball instead of a flat map.
I was superb in history, among many things.
A teacher has to have patience.
Aristotle discovered that the world wasn't flat, not Columbus. You obviously don't know your history.
hun washington was a free mason and he did not discover america
THERE WHERE PEOPLE ALREADY THERE LOL
go study your history correctly
Never thought this earth was flat. Even before when they teached me. And I dunno anyone who thinks that way.
If it was the trips should've interrupted somewhere.
Like earth would be like a plate, we wouldn't travel continously and reach the same place again and again...
img-s2.onedio.com/.../...dbd694d710ad8b0debaa7.jpg
go study it out and compare the two side by side
and look at which one makes more sense
do not believe my wordfs go study it out and prove me wrong you win 5000 dollars if you do
@skeptic002 thanks for the laughter 😂😂😂😂
im not joking there offering 5000 to anyone who can prove them wrong no one has been able to lol
www.reddit.com/.../
Nope I don't. In civil engineering, surveying to be specific. There is a tolerance that has to be put into account that every 100m or 200m distance there is a slight drop, you adjust the height back up by a tiny proportion due to Earth's curvature. Otherwise the alignment of road, bridge span or any other infrastructure would be wrong. The whole geodesy takes the Earth's curvature into account lol
Also the whole coordinates system such as UTM is based off the fact that Earth is fooooocking round! Otherwise the GNSS such the likes of GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo network people are relying today even the flat earthers themselves are using would be wrong LOL. They're benefiting from something they disbelieve
Here you go, one of many other examples
@skeptic002
common sense humps
3.bp.blogspot.com/.../...%2B%25281024x683%2529.jpg
or would you like to also go to planes cause if planes keep going in a straight line they will eventually leave the earth on the ball model
so they would have to constantly tilt down all the time cause they are defying gravity assuming that exist go talk to a pilot
thumbs.dreamstime.com/.../...ckground-48081621.jpg
now lets also take into account wind current at 40 to 70 mph of wind sheer this plane almost crashes (yet they tell us the earth is spinning 1000 mph and planes are just fine?)
not just that but lets assume they could fly in that current ALL PLANES WOULD HAVE TO GO IN THE DIRECTION OF THE EARTHS SPIN to not be destroyed from the amount of pressure
yet they fly in all different directions
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b43lAoovqd8
HEY HUN WHERE IS MY EVIDENCE @ElissaDido
@skeptic002
PM me, please.
The atmosphere spins with the Earth
@Redstang88
how could you prove that?
you can not
and the visual evidence right there shows it, it's a theory they made up like gravity
they just needed something to holds on the ball model so create gravity
cause if you live on a flat plain there is no need for gravity at all
@skeptic002 Gravity isn't exactly up for discussion. Drop a ball, it hits the ground. Something pulls it towards the ground.
And looking at the map of the supposed flat Earth, I cannot see any way that the sun's varying paths through the sky are possible with that theory. It simply doesn't work
@Redstang88 he and I have had the airplane, rotation conversation before, just fyi. Funny how he loves to tell everyone how they don't listen, but he is actually the most stubbornly prejudiced and judmental. Ironic
@Redstang88
okay then prove the earth is a ball and I will believe in gravity and all these other things
should not be hard 500 years of supposed science should knocked the 5000 year old flat earth model out the window
so the earth is magnetized by the iron ore in the ground and there is plenty of it so now i will ask you this again what is the sun made of?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQ_E81_hJjU
cause I have been reading my bible no where does it say the sun is a large ball of fire floating through space if anything it's inside the firmament
what if the sun and moon have some of the same properties as this clock inside it
what if its not really fire and it is a literally light with other magnetized properties in it
https://wiki.tfes.org/images/7/70/SunAnimation.gif
www.journalist.sg/.../...ine_mwjr2bONNv1qij8k6.jpg
@skeptic002 Of course you didn't read it in the bible, people have learned a few things in the past 2-3000 years.
That doesn't factor in the variation in the suns path by season. In June ere we get about 19 hours of daylight with the sun almost directly overhead, in January we get 7 hours at best and the sun is maybe 1/4 way to vertical. The is no way to make things line up
@Redstang88 yes there is!!!
the sun the spreads out as time passes it goes closer to the dome of the earth and spins in a circle
then as time passes it goes closer to the center of the earth and it repeats thats why we have different times ever year
moves away
then close again
then away
the close again
its also why they get if im correct 6 months of darkness in antarctica
cause the sun is closer to the center
Foucault pendulum
And here you go... best line of the intro: " it’s ridiculous to even bother rebutting the Flat Earth Society... But the history of our species’ intellectual pursuit is important and interesting, and it’s very much well worth writing about."
www.popsci.com/10-ways-you-can-prove-earth-is-round
@HaveQuestions
test everything i say
1) in an ancient Arabic text it talks about there being 2 moons one light and one dark do some research on it, so no the sun does nothing to the moon
2) when you can not see the ship or horizon pull out your phone and zoom in you will see it
3) no the stars move not the earth
4) the shadow stick can work on both flat and round surfaces it's already been proven you get the same result
5) Pythagorean circle earth it's based on the curve of the earth so if you are 100 miles away there should be a 5000 to 6000 foot curve cause of the curvature of the earth, so no one should be able to see anything 100 miles away
s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/.../...a4f3e2c496.jpg
1.bp.blogspot.com/.../corsica.jpg
From Genoa, Italy 70 feet above sea-level, the island of Capraia 102 miles away
so that's around 5000 to 6000 feet of curvature why does everyone see it when it;s only 1500 feet high?
"Yes, we can easily explain to all intelligent adults why the Earth looks flat, when it is actually round. But my question is, how can we explain this fact, that the Earth is round, to those people who will not accept new data, which contradicts their knowledge, by providing them with some proper facts?
The question is "how can I convince people to believe something who refuse to be convinced of anything they don't already believe?" You can't, by the premise of the question. You could also ask "how can I convince people to buy me lunch who refuse to ever buy me lunch under any circumstances?" You can't, by the premise of the question. This isn't a physics question." – Eric (on physics stack exchange)
@HaveQuestions
6) from a plane it always looks flat
i.dailymail.co.uk/.../...ge-a-46_1462201935263.jpg
7) so if these balls are round that means the earth is round too?
s3.amazonaws.com/.../466394942_XS.jpg
8) the sun and moon rotate around the earth do you really feel the earth move?
9) there is no gravity we live on a flat plain there is no need for it
10) you mean like this one from NASA
cdn.inquisitr.com/.../Pluto-Conspiracy.jpg
or maybe these
https://testingtheglobe.com/images/BlueMarbles.jpg
@skeptic002 Technology advances, hence the better pictures.
And the last picture is perfect proof of a round Earth. The fucking clouds moved dude, and the pictures were taken of different areas of the earth. You could take a thousand pictures from space and no 2 would be intentical
@Redstang88
take them to an editing program its already been proven that there fake
you can do it yourself you do not have to believe me
but test everything i say yourself
@skeptic002 You can fake anything, that doesn't prove your point
@Redstang88
okay then disprove this
anyone who can disprove this I will believe in the global until then the earth is flat with a dome over it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAcp3BFBYw4
Auguste Piccard 1931 and I quote
it looked like a flat disc with an up turned edge
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8jVJR9zSEs
@skeptic002 Look at sphere, it looks like a disc. And you're going to take one mans testimony and one single video made by a handful of crackpots with an agenda against the scientific conclusion of thousands, if not millions, millions of photos and thousands of hours of video
And this was just the first video I found, many more like it if you want to look
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyq5eN9C4Cc
@Redstang88
pause it at 2:34 get a ruler and check it out it's flat and let it the video play out
I have seen a ton of videos like this was actually what I started with when i was researching this out
now let me ask you this question please give me a good answer? it's on youtube you can see it for yourself
s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/.../...9aeb411b1d.jpg
Of course the Earth is flat - everyone knows that.
On top of that, when you get in an elevator, the building moves up and down while you are held protectively captive until the proper selected floor arrives at the elevator doors.
It's easy to fly too! Simply throw yourself at the ground and miss! The problem is people usually don't miss a target as big as the ground. Birds and some other animals have it figured out though.
Opinion
51Opinion
lmao that guy has an ironic name.
The philosophical definition of his name really applies though...
sk**t*c: an ancient or modern philosopher who denies the possibility of knowledge, or even rational belief, in some sphere.
I think he straight denies the possibility of all knowledge in all spheres even if it makes sense lmao
i like your friend he's smart
"in all SPHERES" #iseeya
www.viralthread.com/.../415.gif
@redeyemindtricks lol lmao
It's definitely not flat, but I know a guy who does think so, but he also believes that the world is controlled by the illuminati, who work for the space reptilians :P
Space reptilian? 😂
Flat as a pancake! Wait, then what would happen when you reached the edge? :o
We fall ðŸ˜
there is no edge where in a DOME
flatearthscienceandbible.files.wordpress.com/.../img_0039-1.jpeg
here you go :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAcp3BFBYw4&t=61s
I believe the earth isn't flat it's round, that is how it can hold so many different countries, cultures, different types of living etc. Now i do believe there is another planet that is similar to earth but it's just not been discovered yet maybe it will be found in about a 50 + years from now.
Shaquille O'Neal Thinks Earth Is Flat Because It Doesn't Go Up And Down When He Drives
its flat go study it out and compare the two
I do, and he's here on the sight. An interesting fellow he is. :)
I don't believe the world is flat myself, but then again.. what is real and what isn't? :3
It's flat, Shaq said it.
you know this is a lie the people living in the area admit seeing it ALL THE TIME so this is stupid
@skeptic002 Ok, so, let's say I agree with the fact the Earth is flat... how thick is the Earth, then?
they have dug 8 miles so far so im guessing its pretty thick it is his foot stool after
that's how small we actually are lol
@skeptic002 8 miles thick? Sounds pretty thin to be a planet. So you don't believe in the layers Earth has, like the core, upper mantle, and all that?
Also, what's right at the bottom of the Earth?
water is at the bottom and no its longer then 8 miles thats just how far they have dug and that pretty damn deep to be honest the earth has layers
but no i do not believe it has a core
wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com/.../...niverse.png
@skeptic002 So how do you explain volcanoes? What's the yellow/red thing that's hot as fuck and comes out like an explosion out of volcanoes?
so lets think about this
the fact that there is lava under the earth that is a fact its spread out through out the earth
so now when you read the bible you constantly read about fire and brimstone as a punishment
brimstone is just another term for lava and when you do your research it says hell is under the earth literally in a certain spot
and as much as I do not like the thought that might be part of the punishment of the people in hell to be burned under the earth in darkness until the judgement and it gets worse once they are thrown into the lake of fire with the devil and all his followers
but It could be something else entirely and have another purpose or many purposes like the
oil we find under the earth comes from all the people and animals and plants during the flood that where submerged so that oil we use some of it is people and animals
@skeptic002 Wait what? Explain to me how volcano eruptions happen.
that one is simple
https://assets.rbl.ms/3694271/1200x600.jpg
www.higherperspectives.com/...cean-1561950869.html
water under the earth with lava and the heat it builds and eventually it explodes pushing the Lava to the surface that one is so easy
@skeptic002 Water and lava together? What? xD
think about it when you boil water it starts to push out and make that noise
so we have large amounts of water under the earth with the heat from lava slowly boiling it
eventually it will push out of some where and there are plenty of cracks in the earth so it does not just come out of volcanos, geysers
geysers definition
a hot spring in which water intermittently boils, sending a tall column of water and steam into the air. how does it boil?
lava its the only thing under the ground that we know of that is hot enough to boil water under the ground
do you really think some one is splashing the lava into the air lol no its pressure
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmCJSS2YAP0
People are going to believe what they believe or how they perceive it. It's a sphere, three dimensional.
its flat
@skeptic002 to you and others that believe and perceive it. I see it as a sphere, each to their own.
okay believe a lie I will call you dumb for studying it out
I think he was just trolling you, nobody can be that stup..., right? :
Sadly He isn't trolling...
go stupid it out and compare the two side by side flat and ball
first off do not hide my NAME everyone knows who i am already
lol
and yes im CORRECT the Earth is Flat and thanks for the exposure the more people know the more people will look into it and find out it really is flat we already have 18 million let's increase that number thanks :)
ALSO IM STILL WAITING FOR THE EVIDENCE HUN :)
Why has nobody found the edge?
Enjoy the spotlight lol.
@Redstang88
there is no edge
we live inside a snow globe sort of speak
flatearthscienceandbible.files.wordpress.com/.../img_0039-1.jpeg
and here you go the waters above the firmament :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAcp3BFBYw4&t=51s
2 Timothy 2:15
Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth
www.girlsaskguys.com/.../q2346573-ye-waters-above-the-heavens
Pay to go up in an extremely high altitude balloon, like the madman who did the longest freefall, and have a look for yourself. Concord's no longer in service, unfortunately.
www.space.com/...pace-tourism-balloon-flights.html
https://space.1337arts.com/
https://youtu.be/MCBBRRp9DOQ?t=186
@goaded
AUGUSTE PICCARD ALREADY DID IT
1931
THE WATERS ABOVE THE FIRMAMENT :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8jVJR9zSEs&t=7s
If it is flat, there has to be an edge.
That video shows a rocket running out of fuel and being pulled back to Earth by gravity. Not sure how that proves the Earth is flat.
@Redstang88
how could you prove anything you just said about the rocket?
you said it ran out of fuel prove it? or are you making guesses like everyone else does
Watch the video - you can see vapour trail as the rocket is climbing, and supsiciously, right before the rocket "hits the dome" - no vapour trail.
And that thump was added later, no way you'd hear that over the sound of the engines and the sound of the rocker passing through the air.
And you still haven't explained "the edge". There has to be an end somewhere, if in fact the Earth were flat.
@Redstang88
as for the end it's Antarctica it circles the earth (The Antarctic Treaty no one is allowed to go explore it) yet for some reason they let a masonic priest visit Antarctica isn't it suppose to be a scientific endeavor mospat.ru/.../2P20160217-PAL_2158-1200-1.jpg
and as for how many miles more past Antarctica to hit the dome im not sure but im sure it isn't super close and as for the stoires of Antarctica WOAHHHHHHH SO MANY
planetruthblog.files.wordpress.com/.../ice-wall-7.jpg
What do you mean you're not allowed to explore it? Many people have, I have relatives that have flown in the Antarctic
@Redstang88
one prove your case that they did
and did they go all the way to the end cause there are bases in Antarctica at the time of
World 2 Hitler was said to have a base in Antarctica and they sent a few thousand troops to finds him 5000 if im correct
and the stories from the troops are the complete opposite of what we hear in the media or school
you ever heard of the Yeti, Bigfoot, or a very tall human like creature
well a yeti killed some of the soldiers in Antarctica this right here is called the Jotunn from Norse history when the gods came down and raped the women of the earth and they gave birth to the giants
wiki.guildwars2.com/.../...otun_01_concept_art.jpg
surbrook.devermore.net/.../giant-skeleton_02.jpg
www.sott.net/.../giant_mound_builder.jpg
calmcrash.files.wordpress.com/.../...feet-tall.jpg
ekladata.com/ewh9cWj9SX20kl_kShhR-SH6PAA.jpg
I HAVE PHYSICAL EVIDENCE FOR EVERYTHING I SAY :)
I wasn't there, I can't prove it, but why would they lie? Are they of this supposed giant global "conspiracy" that the Earth is round? What does that accomplish?
I've heard of Bigfoot/Yeti, but I've never seen any solid evidence of them. Where exactly did a yeti kill soldiers?
No you don't, you have a few isolated pieces of very vague or easily faked evidence and a few Bible quotes. Hardly scientific
@Redstang88
now when it comes to your family in Antarctica I could believe it but if they did go it was more like a tour then an exploration
only the rulers of the earth know about this stuff and they decided to invent a lie 500 years ago all Jesuit trained or occult trained which you like to call it here is a list
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jesuit_scientists
what does it accomplish lying to everyone about the shape of the earth will
NASA's FY 2011 budget of $18.4 billion, not just that but they are occultist they worship Satan and follow him so they are liars
the yeti killed soldiers in Antarctica if im correct only one soldier returned to report back
that's why GOD said kill them all women children and men
Deuteronomy 20:17
But thou shalt utterly destroy them; namely, the Hittites, and the Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites; as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee
HUMANS VS GIANTS
They're pilots, they flew supply runs to the research stations.
One guy returns from an entire division, going to hazard a guess the all froze to death and the one survivor was probably near dead from exposure himself. Those kind of circumstances can do crazy things to your mind, not exactly the most reliable eyewitness.
@Redstang88
READ THE STORIES
the soldier was forced to change the stories after word and he was told to tell no one
then he wrote about what really happen later on
you have to read this out for yourself
You need help
@Redstang88
Hey look you believe this girl when i asked for evidence SHE GAVE ZERO NOTHING NADA!!!
yet you ask me questions and I have answers and physical evidence for so what I say do you think she has actually done her research
or is she just stupid girl who has never studied on her own
you make the choice
Don't get me wrong, I don't acknowledge the slightest possibility you might be correct, I only ask questions to poke holes in your arguments.
I almost thought you were capable of a rational discussion for a change, until you went right back to the insults.
@Redstang88
she called me out that's on her
you didn't have to respond but i can tell you wanted answers
so i will give you answers to the best of my ability but if you really wanna compare go study it out and compare both of them side by side
you do not have to believe me but go study it out nothing wrong with more knowledge
Dude, please never change. You just keep saying that you're saying man, don't let people dissuade you from saying the things you say. Please say more things.
@skeptic002 dude I respect your opinion. i think you should stop watching YouTube videos and try to find a live image of the earth as an evidence.
i can't trust YouTube all the time somehow.
@realperson02
i believe you here you can do some math for yourself this is called the pythagorean circle earth basically what they did is get the size of the earth in the ball model and where checking how much of a curve should be at ever mile and at least get a good estimate based off the distance cause after a certain amount of miles you should see anything
s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/.../...a4f3e2c496.jpg
so at 100 miles there is a curve of 6000 feet give or take on the ball earth
the tallest building is 2,717 feet
From Genoa, Italy 70 feet above sea-level, the island of Capraia 102 miles away can often be seen as well, so lets assume its a 6000ft curve
take off 70 feet 5930 feet in curvature now WHY DO WE STILL SEE THE ISLAND IF THERE SHOULD BE A 5000 TO 6000 FOOT CURVE COVERING IT UP
1.bp.blogspot.com/.../corsica.jpg
well i can't say for anything about italy but yeah where i live , i can't see the anything after a few miles in the sea. you may have a point regarding the pythagorean circle earth but I hope there are more evidences to it.
@realperson02
when you can't see a boat anymore take out your phone and zoom in you will see it and when it disappears again zoom in again
people are literally buying really expensive cameras to go find out how far they can actually see
would you like a history lesson
1. The boat disappears hull first (and you would see it for longer if you were higher up).
2. The island is visible because of an upside-down mirage, like the example you gave of Chicago (for which you provided an excellent explanation for in a video).
3. If the earth was flat, the island would be visible on every clear day, not just with particular weather conditions.
4. Piccard saw a disc because that's what a ball looks like from a distance (try it!).
@goaded
does it look like he is telling the truth lol!!! just look at his face not just that but people living in the area have said this is a lie go do the research they see it all the time they admit it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbn9BBppR5g
for the hull just pull out the phone and zoom in that's it and you will see it
the Island should not be visible at all the curve is 5000 to 6000 feet
the island is what 1,529 ft you are missing a whole 3000 to 4000 feet so yeah what you said made no sense
AUGUSTE PICCARD 1931
AND I QUOTE IT LOOKED LIKE A DISC WITH AN UPTURNED EDGE
When He established the heavens, I was there, When He INSCRIBED a circle on the face of the deep
when you inscribe wood it creates an upturned edge
www.redferret.net/.../woodburningiron_small.jpg
waters above the firmament that is why the sky is blue
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8jVJR9zSEs
You can't argue with stupid. Best just to give such people some crayons and put them in a quiet corner.
go study it out
I don't believe that the Earth is flat. The take was by @joygirl. But the actual man who prepared the take was somebody else.
go study it out
its people like this that make me contemplate suicide. the earth is round. the fact that we can jump the same height all over the world, is proof without even going to space
its flat trust me
if it were flat, the further we got from the equator prime meridian intersection, the higher we could jump
no because we are enclosed not in space you ever wonder why the sky is blue
cause there is water on the other side of the firmament
flatearthscienceandbible.files.wordpress.com/.../img_0039-1.jpeg
Yeah I've got into it with him before. There are idiots, then there's a whole other level of out-there, and then there's that guy.
Whatever, its fun to wind up idiots.
You seriously did this? Wow, ok. I see... lol
I one to observe people before talking to them, and I think I have seen enough of your opinions/questions that makes me think your a drama queen. All you had to do was show him evidence, but since you have none, you write a question showing your stupidity. Don't worry, I have that before.
I know who you are sweaty, didn't need to go anon ;)
I know you do. I can go anon if I want to.
I have no evidence? 😂 you must be like him, no amount of evidence would have been enough! Lol
*sweety
To correct you. It is sweety**
Too late 😚😙
No, I am not like him, he is very different from me, but we are friends. You didn't need to do what you just did, but ok.
There is a reason I erased his name, joygirl. But apparently he is famous for his BS on here.
Sorry, I am not a touchy person. Lose the kissy face
I can put a kiss face if I want, just like you can be anon ;)
I know he is. So, why hide his name?
Hahaha... lmao
Yeah, you can. We all have a right. 😂
Gods, I wish my sisters got along as well as you two.
lol :P
@DarklordOdin
Lmao... I got mad over nothing ( On my period, still. 😅).
Meh, girl are wild. 😂
Eh, I'm not one to judge.
@DarklordOdin
Lmao 😂
hey it's your own fault you picked a fight with a flat earth society member lol
Lol ;) :D
I don't believe that earth is flat and thankfully I don't know anyone who does.
😂 It's kinda funny how I know which user that is lol.
Saw that one. Wasn't sure if he's serious or a great troll lol
I also thought he was trolling haha at first
No troll, I used to think that too. I think he really is that insane.
@ElissaDido Trolling? the flat Earth Society wouldn't ever do that!
ROFLMAO
is flat trust me
Round Earth doctrine is little more than an elaborate hoax by the Illuminati.:D
@jacquesvol
prove your cause then
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions